STR vs MTR vs LTR: Choosing the Right Rental Strategy
The property is the same. The strategy determines the income, the workload, the risk, and whether your investment actually cash flows. Here's how to think through all three.
The Three Strategies
LTR — Long-Term Rental Traditional tenancy of 1 year or longer. One tenant, fixed rent, minimal turnover.
MTR — Medium-Term Rental Furnished unit rented for 1–6 months to corporate travelers, contractors, travelling healthcare workers, insurance placements, or relocating families. Growing segment in most mid-sized Canadian cities.
STR — Short-Term Rental Nightly or weekly rentals via Airbnb or Vrbo. Highest potential income, highest operational complexity, highest regulatory risk.
Long-Term Rental (LTR)
The Case For
- Predictable income — fixed monthly rent regardless of vacancy seasonality
- Minimal management — find a tenant, sign a lease, collect rent
- Lower expense ratio — no cleaning fees, no consumables, no furnishing costs
- Mortgage financing is easiest — lenders are comfortable with LTR income in qualification models
- Legal framework is clear — provincial tenancy acts govern everything; follow them and you're protected
The Case Against
- Rent control limits upside in Ontario for pre-2018 buildings (2.5% increase guideline in 2024)
- Eviction protection for tenants means problem tenants can take months to remove legally
- Income capped at market rent — you cannot respond quickly to rental rate increases
Best For
Investors who want a low-maintenance, passive income stream. Works well in any market where gross rent yields ≥ 5–6% of purchase price. The 1% Rule (monthly rent ≥ 1% of purchase price) is hard to hit in Toronto or Vancouver but achievable in Hamilton, London, Windsor, Halifax, and other secondary markets.
Ontario-Specific Note
Units built after November 15, 2018 are exempt from rent control — you can set rent freely on tenant turnover. If you're buying new construction for LTR, the rent control exemption is a significant advantage.
Medium-Term Rental (MTR)
The Case For
- Higher nightly/monthly rates than LTR — furnished 1-bedroom in downtown Toronto: $2,800–$4,500/month MTR vs $2,200–$2,800 for unfurnished LTR
- Tenancy Act exemption in Ontario — stays under 6 months in a furnished unit are not covered by the RTA, giving landlords more flexibility than LTR
- Less volatility than STR — multi-week bookings provide income stability without nightly logistics
- Growing demand — corporate housing, travel nursing, and insurance placements are reliable demand sources
- Lower regulatory risk than STR — most municipalities regulate Airbnb/Vrbo, not furnished monthly rentals
The Case Against
- Furnishing costs — outfitting a unit with quality furniture, appliances, and linens typically costs $8,000–$20,000 upfront
- Marketing and admin — you manage your own listings, background checks, and turnover (or pay a MTR management company)
- Vacancies between tenants — gaps of 1–2 weeks between bookings are common
- Income isn't fully passive — requires more active management than LTR
Target Markets
MTR works best near:
- Major employment districts (corporate travelers, short contracts)
- Hospitals and medical centers (traveling nurses, locum physicians)
- Universities during term start/end (visiting professors, grad students)
- Insurance company relationships (insurance placements after disasters)
Platforms
Furnished Finder (biggest MTR-specific platform in North America), Airbnb's monthly stay feature, direct corporate relationships, and local Facebook groups for furnished rentals.
Short-Term Rental (STR)
The Case For
- Highest gross income potential — a well-located Toronto 1-bedroom can earn $4,000–$7,000+/month on Airbnb vs $2,200–$2,500 unfurnished LTR
- Full price flexibility — adjust rates daily based on demand, seasonality, and events
- Access to property — you can use the unit yourself when not booked
- No long-term tenant disputes — guests leave; bad experiences don't compound
The Case Against
- Regulatory crackdowns — Toronto, Vancouver, Ottawa, Montreal have significant STR restrictions
- Toronto: STR limited to your principal residence only (you must live there) — investment properties cannot legally operate as full-time STRs
- Vancouver: Similar principal residence requirement; licencing required
- BC: Province-wide STR restrictions effective 2024 — municipalities can set their own rules
- Operational intensity — guest communication, cleaning between stays, restocking, maintenance all happen constantly
- Platform dependency — algorithm changes or account suspension on Airbnb can wipe income overnight
- Higher expense ratio — cleaning ($80–$150/turn), supplies, furnishing replacement, Airbnb fees (3%)
- Seasonal income — occupancy can drop significantly in off-season months
- Insurance — standard landlord insurance does NOT cover STR. Need specific short-term rental insurance (Aircover helps but doesn't fully substitute)
Where STR Still Works Legally
- Cottage country (Muskoka, Prince Edward County, Kawartha Lakes) — most rural municipalities have not banned STRs, and seasonal demand is extremely strong
- Your own home — renting a room or basement suite in your principal residence is permitted in most municipalities
- Markets without principal residence restrictions — check your municipality's specific bylaws before buying
Strategy Comparison at a Glance
| Factor | LTR | MTR | STR |
| Monthly gross income | Lowest | Medium | Highest |
| Management intensity | Low | Medium | High |
| Regulatory risk | Lowest | Low | High (urban) |
| Vacancy risk | Low | Medium | Medium-High |
| Furnishing required? | No | Yes | Yes |
| Eviction protection for tenant? | Yes (RTA) | No (< 6 months, furnished) | No |
| Best mortgage qualification | ✅ Easiest | ✅ Good | ⚠️ Harder |
How to Choose
Your primary question: What is the highest-and-best-use allowed in my municipality?
Check this before you buy, not after. A property you plan to run as an STR in Toronto is legally required to be your principal residence — making it nearly useless as a traditional investment property.
Then: Model all three strategies on the same property using real numbers. Compare net income after vacancy, expenses, and management costs — not gross revenue.
Finally: Match the strategy to your lifestyle. LTR requires the least involvement. STR requires the most. MTR sits in the middle and is underutilized by most Canadian investors. For newcomers building a portfolio alongside a full-time career, MTR often hits the right balance of return and effort.
The property doesn't care which strategy you use. The market, the municipality, and your time availability determine the right answer.
Written by Raunaq Singh, Founder of Maple Syrup Money.
Join the Discussion
Have thoughts on this article? Share your questions, experiences, or insights with the community.